For my position paper I argued that all community water
resources should be fluoridated in New Zealand. There were vast amounts of
literature and primary research arguing that water fluoridation is safe and
effective, and that community water fluoridation provided the best defense
against dental caries and improving oral health. On the other hand it was not
easy to find good research that supported the opposing side of my argument.
I was pleasantly surprised to find opposing journal articles
about primary research on the relationship between water fluoridation and bone
cancer. I felt that it was important to address this claim, which has
predominately come from the anti fluoridation side, in order to address the
claim that water fluoridation is harmful.
The first article supports the anti fluoridation argument and researched
the link between bone cancer and water fluoridation in the United States and
was conducted by Elise Bassin, David Wypij, Roger Davis and Murray Mittleman
(2006). This study compared the incidences of bone cancer against the
individual’s exposure to fluoridated water. They used logistic regression; method
of finding statistical probabilities, to show that males under 20 years of age
residing in areas of community water fluoridation have an increased risk of
developing bone cancer and concluded that there was an link present. This
conclusion was reached due to the fact the authors had to estimate what level
of fluoride each subject would have been exposed without being able to obtain
actual fluoride levels from each respective area. Bassin et al. (2006) clearly
had confidence in their findings, however, no causal relationship was found
during this research meaning that they did not prove that water fluoridation
causes cancer.
The opposing argument to the previous research study is that
there is no link between bone cancer and fluoridation water and that water
fluoridation plays no part in causing the occurrence of bone cancer. This
second research article substantiates this claim and was completed in Ireland
by Harry Comber, Sandra Deady, Erin Montgomery, and Anna Gavin (2011). The
research compared bone cancer occurrences and whether the patient had resided
in a fluoridated or non-fluoridated area. The data shows no difference in the
number of bone cancer diagnosis of those living in an area with water
fluoridation present and those living in no fluoridated areas. Therefore,
Comber et al. (2011) reached the conclusion that there was no relationship
between ingesting fluoridated water and the development of bone cancer, causal
or otherwise. The data used in this study was easy to understand and clearly
showed no relationship which I believe strengthened the authors’ findings that
there was no link between water fluoridation and bone cancer.
Bassin, E. B.,
Wypij, D., & Davis, R. B. (2006). Age-specific fluoride exposure in
drinking water and osteosarcoma (United States). Cancer Causes Control, 17, 421-428.
Comber, H., Deady,
S., Montgomery, E., & Gavin, A. (2010). Drinking water fluoridation and
osteosarcoma incidence on the island of Ireland. Cancer Causes Control, 22, 919-924.
Hi Nadine, I had never heard of water fluoridation being a possible cause of bone cancer and find it a very interesting idea that I am interested in reading more about. If it were true I feel that there would be a lot more opposition to the proposition of fluoridated water.
ReplyDeleteNice work Nadine, I could understand it even though I have no idea about bone cancer and links with fluoride. Sounds like a very interesting topic, I cant wait to see what you bring us to read for the team report.
ReplyDelete